Scenario 1. The Trojan horse

Microsoft noticed in 2009-2010 that it was in deep trouble. There was a risk, as the industry moved towards mobile devices and away from the desktop, that Microsoft would be left out. Microsoft was about to loose its core business in the long run to Apple and Google. So, they came up with a brilliant plan. Behind the scenes Microsoft would influence the attitudes of the American institutions that still hold power in Nokia. The American investors pressure the Board of Directors to change the CEO due the reason that Nokia has been underperforming in the USA market. They even blackmail the Chairman, Jorma Ollila by threatening to dismantle the Board of Directors by voting against it in the next general meeting if this doesn’t happen. The Chairman gives in and fires the current CEO, O.P Kallasvuo. At this point everyone inside Nokia still believes that the reason behind this move is the American investors dissatisfaction towards the situation in the USA market. The truth starts to settle in when Ollila’s number one candidate for CEO, Anssi Vanjoki, gets rejected by the American investors and institutions. They demand that the new CEO needs to have a software background and experience of the North-American market – he needs to be an American. Along comes Stephen Elop who pleases everyone. Ollila appoints Elop as the CEO but stresses that Elop is to concentrate only on implementing the existing strategy that the Board of Directors has agreed on. When in reality Microsoft has been behind this all along, acting behind the curtains, behind the American institutions. Microsoft has succeeded; they now have their own marionette running Nokia. With the support of Microsoft and the power they have over the American investors Elop goes to work. He throws Nokia’s old strategy, the one that he was supposed to implement, out of the window. And partners with Microsoft and by doing so secures their future.

Scenario 2. Elop the Conqueror

Ollila realises that Apple and Google are getting away. He drafts a plan to get Nokia back in the game. He hires Elop for the CEO post due to his talents and expertise in software and knowledge of the American market. Elop goes to work and realises that the current strategy isn’t strong enough. Apple and Google are getting away and MeeGo isn’t ready. He uses his contacts in Microsoft and begins negotiations with the company. He knows that Microsoft’s current mobile strategy is going nowhere without Nokia. He pressures the company and gives them two options. Either to bend to his terms or face the possibility of “extinction”. Elop gets the better deal, a new operating system and services for a very reasonable price. Nokia gets what it wants and is back in the game quicker than anyone thought was possible. Apple and Google can still be beaten. He knows that the other WP7 manufactures will most likely dump WP7 after this announcement and concentrate on Android. It doesn’t matter; Nokia has it own OS again. Elop keeps MeeGo alive. His plan is to use Microsoft to get back in the saddle. To make Nokia strong, destroy Apple’s and Google’s plans, conquer America and then introduce MeeGo as the new super-duper OS for phones and tablets.

Which one do you believe more? If you have a better scenario please do share!

Update 13.2.2011: At MWC in Barcelona during a Q&A session voice from the audience asked Elop “are you a trojan horse?” Elop: “I’ll take that question. The obvious answer is no. We made sure that the entire management team was involved in the process, and of course the board of directors of Nokia are the only ones that can make this significant of a decision about Nokia. They made that final decision on Thursday night.”


Responses

  1. Chris (@creip) Avatar
    Chris (@creip)

    Have you heard of this rumour going around:
    http://mobileappswatch.com/2011/01/rumor-nokia-chair-forced-to-pick-elop-as-ceo-under-threat/

    I believe the first site to run this rumour was PhoneArena.

    Makes perfect sense to me. Makes perfect sense why Vanjoki wasn’t the one too.

    Thanks for your blog!

  2. Chris (@creip) Avatar
    Chris (@creip)

    Have you heard of this rumour going around:
    http://mobileappswatch.com/2011/01/rumor-nokia-chair-forced-to-pick-elop-as-ceo-under-threat/

    I believe the first site to run this rumour was PhoneArena.

    Makes perfect sense to me. Makes perfect sense why Vanjoki wasn’t the one too.

    Thanks for your blog!

  3. Ville Aho Avatar
    Ville Aho

    You’re most welcome!

    These are all just rumors. It is really difficult to say what is the real truth. But to me it is a bit peculiar that Ollila hasn’t commented these changes at all.

    Time will tell. 😉

  4. Ville Aho Avatar
    Ville Aho

    You’re most welcome!

    These are all just rumors. It is really difficult to say what is the real truth. But to me it is a bit peculiar that Ollila hasn’t commented these changes at all.

    Time will tell. 😉

  5. GeceBekcisi Avatar
    GeceBekcisi

    Elop is the 7th largest individual Microsoft shareholder while he doesn’t own any Nokia shares. (Finnish newspaper Aamulehti, http://bit.ly/hfTFY4)

    So “Scenario 1” is not only a scenario, but probably really what has happened behind the scenes.

    1. Ville Aho Avatar
      Ville Aho

      I find this very interesting, yet somewhat alarming.

      1. GeceBekcisi Avatar
        GeceBekcisi

        Well, what can I say.

        It was a war between MS and Nokia&Ericsson that started 15 years ago, which gave birth to Symbian with $5 per handset licence fee, while WM was $55 per handset.

        Open source MeeGo was an ultimate threat to MS, they couldn’t risk being screwed once more in mobile arena by Nokia.

        Instead, they just bought Nokia for $0 and they’ll milk it as much as possible, just like other OEMs that are tied to MS ecosystem.

        Also, this is just another proof to the trojan horse theory: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-11/former-microsoft-exec-to-head-nokia-s-us-business.html

        1. Ville Aho Avatar
          Ville Aho

          Hiring Ex-Microsoft employees doesn’t necessary mean anything, except that they are qualified workers. However, if this trend continues and all major positions get filled with ex-Microsoft people or Americans it will be another story. Nokia is a Finnish company, in good and in bad. Trying to change that or Americanize Nokia would demolish the corporate culture and kill the Nokia that we now know.

          1. GeceBekcisi Avatar
            GeceBekcisi

            Yes, hiring Ex-Microsoft employees wouldn’t necessary mean anything, only if they weren’t slowly overtaking the company.

            Just look to the company now and count how many of the people that crated the global leader brand, is left now. Anyone that wouldn’t/didn’t want MS on top of Nokia, has been kicked/led out of the company somehow.

            The core that made Nokia the “Nokia”, is demolished already.

    2. Ville Aho Avatar
      Ville Aho

      Interesting news just in! According to Helsingin Sanomat (Helsinki Times, biggest paper in Finland) The Securities Markets Act forbade Elop from selling his Microsoft shares and/or buying Nokia shares, in order to avoid allegations of inside trading.

      (In Finnish) http://www.hs.fi/talous/artikkeli/Nokia+Pörssilaki+esti+Stephen+Elopin+Nokia-ostot/1135263769613

      1. GeceBekcisi Avatar
        GeceBekcisi

        That seems to be Nokia’s explanation to the newspaper, possibly a PR stunt and I lost my confidence in them, don’t believe much.

        Also after analysing the announcement you can see clearly Nokia is giving away way more stuff than MS offers, this guy can’t be working for Nokia’s interest really.

        More reading:

        http://moconews.net/article/419-analyst-some-u.s.-nokia-execs-will-be-angry.-they-wanted-android/
        It’s like a one-sided marriage. Nokia is committing itself, and getting getting rid of its ugly girlfriends [that would be Symbian and MeeGo]. But Microsoft gets to keep seeing other people

        http://blogs.forbes.com/ericsavitz/2011/02/11/nokia-microsoft-deal-leaves-investors-unsatisfied/
        Nokia’s smartphone share will dissipate even faster over the next few quarters as consumers wait for new Windows phones. Changing the tires while the car is moving is not going to be easy.

        1. Ville Aho Avatar
          Ville Aho

          We don’t really know what are the benefits for Nokia. It might still be that MeeGo just wasn’t ready or up to the challenge. In that case Nokia only had one viable option, WP7. Android would have been even worse of the two bad options. Still, this does make you wonder. Ex-Microsoft executive gives Microsoft deal of a lifetime. This is just too good and convenient to happen by change.

          Why didn’t Nokia buy WebOS? They could have used it instead of WP7 and make it Qt compliant. Symbian for lower-end, WebOS for middle and MeeGo for super-duper phones. It would have kept Nokia independent and made the transition from Symbian a lot easier if and when WebOS supported Qt.

          I think I would have a better feeling about this deal if Nokia was “just another” OEM. There is nothing wrong in using WP7, it is all the other stuff, the ecosystem, that is worrying me. Nokia should introduce a strategy where they offer any OS the consumer wants (maybe not iOS) be it Symbian, MeeGo, Android, WebOS, WP7, Bada. How will they ever detach themselves from Microsoft now?

          1. GeceBekcisi Avatar
            GeceBekcisi

            Well, MeeGo was more ready for Nokia than WP7 is at the moment according to Nokia employees (check http://blog.mardy.it/2011/02/committed-to-linux.html or mirror @ http://drippler.com/nokia_n900/confusions-of-a-maemo-enthusiast-post-211 )

            Paying royalties for WP7 as any OEM does while offering Navteq’s maps to MS for free (which were worth $8.1 *billion* when Nokia bought) and destroying Ovi brand is not a defendable move. You don’t abort babies at 8th month.

            They already invested in their own ecosystem too much and it started fruiting this year, though their stupid decisions made them restart a couple of times.

            A third OS would be expensive to look after, they already had 3 (S40, Symbian and MeeGo) Though, WebOS has Qt packeges right now (check http://opensource.palm.com/2.0.0/index.html search for qt4)

            They could have adopted Android or WP7 only for the US market and kept their Symbian for the rest of the world (who didn’t have much problems with it) until MeeGo was ready for the prime time. Elop simply gave up in favor of Microsoft, announcing deal of the century.

            I hope Nokia steps back as quick as possible and get rid of MS, otherwise we’ll be bound to Apple/Google/Microsoft’s closed ecosystems which I definitely don’t find good for humankind. They’re too much abusive to users, Nokia’s approach was more humane.

          2. Ville Aho Avatar
            Ville Aho

            Thank You!

            I knew about some of the announced things already beforehand. Like that Nokia was going to choose WP7 or Android (I was 90% sure that it was going to be WP7) and that they were shifting away from MeeGo. However, I was under the impression that this might be only for the U.S. market. I had no idea that they would dump Qt and Ovi! I would really love to hear comments about this from Ollila or ex-“Nokians” e.g. OPK or Vanjoki.

  6. GeceBekcisi Avatar
    GeceBekcisi

    Elop is the 7th largest individual Microsoft shareholder while he doesn’t own any Nokia shares. (Finnish newspaper Aamulehti, http://bit.ly/hfTFY4)

    So “Scenario 1” is not only a scenario, but probably really what has happened behind the scenes.

    1. Ville Aho Avatar
      Ville Aho

      I find this very interesting, yet somewhat alarming.

      1. GeceBekcisi Avatar
        GeceBekcisi

        Well, what can I say.

        It was a war between MS and Nokia&Ericsson that started 15 years ago, which gave birth to Symbian with $5 per handset licence fee, while WM was $55 per handset.

        Open source MeeGo was an ultimate threat to MS, they couldn’t risk being screwed once more in mobile arena by Nokia.

        Instead, they just bought Nokia for $0 and they’ll milk it as much as possible, just like other OEMs that are tied to MS ecosystem.

        Also, this is just another proof to the trojan horse theory: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-11/former-microsoft-exec-to-head-nokia-s-us-business.html

        1. Ville Aho Avatar
          Ville Aho

          Hiring Ex-Microsoft employees doesn’t necessary mean anything, except that they are qualified workers. However, if this trend continues and all major positions get filled with ex-Microsoft people or Americans it will be another story. Nokia is a Finnish company, in good and in bad. Trying to change that or Americanize Nokia would demolish the corporate culture and kill the Nokia that we now know.

          1. GeceBekcisi Avatar
            GeceBekcisi

            Yes, hiring Ex-Microsoft employees wouldn’t necessary mean anything, only if they weren’t slowly overtaking the company.

            Just look to the company now and count how many of the people that crated the global leader brand, is left now. Anyone that wouldn’t/didn’t want MS on top of Nokia, has been kicked/led out of the company somehow.

            The core that made Nokia the “Nokia”, is demolished already.

    2. Ville Aho Avatar
      Ville Aho

      Interesting news just in! According to Helsingin Sanomat (Helsinki Times, biggest paper in Finland) The Securities Markets Act forbade Elop from selling his Microsoft shares and/or buying Nokia shares, in order to avoid allegations of inside trading.

      (In Finnish) http://www.hs.fi/talous/artikkeli/Nokia+Pörssilaki+esti+Stephen+Elopin+Nokia-ostot/1135263769613

      1. GeceBekcisi Avatar
        GeceBekcisi

        That seems to be Nokia’s explanation to the newspaper, possibly a PR stunt and I lost my confidence in them, don’t believe much.

        Also after analysing the announcement you can see clearly Nokia is giving away way more stuff than MS offers, this guy can’t be working for Nokia’s interest really.

        More reading:

        http://moconews.net/article/419-analyst-some-u.s.-nokia-execs-will-be-angry.-they-wanted-android/
        It’s like a one-sided marriage. Nokia is committing itself, and getting getting rid of its ugly girlfriends [that would be Symbian and MeeGo]. But Microsoft gets to keep seeing other people

        http://blogs.forbes.com/ericsavitz/2011/02/11/nokia-microsoft-deal-leaves-investors-unsatisfied/
        Nokia’s smartphone share will dissipate even faster over the next few quarters as consumers wait for new Windows phones. Changing the tires while the car is moving is not going to be easy.

        1. Ville Aho Avatar
          Ville Aho

          We don’t really know what are the benefits for Nokia. It might still be that MeeGo just wasn’t ready or up to the challenge. In that case Nokia only had one viable option, WP7. Android would have been even worse of the two bad options. Still, this does make you wonder. Ex-Microsoft executive gives Microsoft deal of a lifetime. This is just too good and convenient to happen by change.

          Why didn’t Nokia buy WebOS? They could have used it instead of WP7 and make it Qt compliant. Symbian for lower-end, WebOS for middle and MeeGo for super-duper phones. It would have kept Nokia independent and made the transition from Symbian a lot easier if and when WebOS supported Qt.

          I think I would have a better feeling about this deal if Nokia was “just another” OEM. There is nothing wrong in using WP7, it is all the other stuff, the ecosystem, that is worrying me. Nokia should introduce a strategy where they offer any OS the consumer wants (maybe not iOS) be it Symbian, MeeGo, Android, WebOS, WP7, Bada. How will they ever detach themselves from Microsoft now?

          1. GeceBekcisi Avatar
            GeceBekcisi

            Well, MeeGo was more ready for Nokia than WP7 is at the moment according to Nokia employees (check http://blog.mardy.it/2011/02/committed-to-linux.html or mirror @ http://drippler.com/nokia_n900/confusions-of-a-maemo-enthusiast-post-211 )

            Paying royalties for WP7 as any OEM does while offering Navteq’s maps to MS for free (which were worth $8.1 *billion* when Nokia bought) and destroying Ovi brand is not a defendable move. You don’t abort babies at 8th month.

            They already invested in their own ecosystem too much and it started fruiting this year, though their stupid decisions made them restart a couple of times.

            A third OS would be expensive to look after, they already had 3 (S40, Symbian and MeeGo) Though, WebOS has Qt packeges right now (check http://opensource.palm.com/2.0.0/index.html search for qt4)

            They could have adopted Android or WP7 only for the US market and kept their Symbian for the rest of the world (who didn’t have much problems with it) until MeeGo was ready for the prime time. Elop simply gave up in favor of Microsoft, announcing deal of the century.

            I hope Nokia steps back as quick as possible and get rid of MS, otherwise we’ll be bound to Apple/Google/Microsoft’s closed ecosystems which I definitely don’t find good for humankind. They’re too much abusive to users, Nokia’s approach was more humane.

          2. Ville Aho Avatar
            Ville Aho

            Thank You!

            I knew about some of the announced things already beforehand. Like that Nokia was going to choose WP7 or Android (I was 90% sure that it was going to be WP7) and that they were shifting away from MeeGo. However, I was under the impression that this might be only for the U.S. market. I had no idea that they would dump Qt and Ovi! I would really love to hear comments about this from Ollila or ex-“Nokians” e.g. OPK or Vanjoki.

  7. A.T. Avatar
    A.T.

    oh please… since spring 2008, 100% MS-owned-subsidiary IT provider pushed into IT of Nokia at weird circumstances (extremely short zero money supply exactly at time to renegotiate major IT contracts) and soon almost exclusively maintains email/calendar/etc … Lotus Notes infrastructure (which could keep MS-owned IT unable to read critical data) is phased out. PGP is removed and substituted by S/MIME solution by MS. So, which scenario you choose, eh?

    1. Ville Aho Avatar
      Ville Aho

      Interesting insight! Thank you! Anymore facts, fiction, speculation?

      1. A.T. Avatar
        A.T.

        well, you want me to point to humans who can get fired for facts observed?

  8. A.T. Avatar
    A.T.

    oh please… since spring 2008, 100% MS-owned-subsidiary IT provider pushed into IT of Nokia at weird circumstances (extremely short zero money supply exactly at time to renegotiate major IT contracts) and soon almost exclusively maintains email/calendar/etc … Lotus Notes infrastructure (which could keep MS-owned IT unable to read critical data) is phased out. PGP is removed and substituted by S/MIME solution by MS. So, which scenario you choose, eh?

    1. Ville Aho Avatar
      Ville Aho

      Interesting insight! Thank you! Anymore facts, fiction, speculation?

      1. A.T. Avatar
        A.T.

        well, you want me to point to humans who can get fired for facts observed?

  9. Texrat Avatar
    Texrat

    Hmmm… maybe some bizarre combination of the two? 😉

  10. Texrat Avatar
    Texrat

    Hmmm… maybe some bizarre combination of the two? 😉

  11. guest Avatar
    guest

    From the history books: a failed US telecom merger. Six months between Verizon merger announcement and partner bankruptcy, followed by $1B investor-funded lawsuit against Verizon. During the period between announcement and bankruptcy, extensive operational knowledge was shared with Verizon in preparation for merging of the two broadband networks.

    http://www.stockskill.net/NPNTQ/NorthPoint-and-Verizion–looking-back.html
    http://www.stockskill.net

  12. guest Avatar
    guest

    From the history books: a failed US telecom merger. Six months between Verizon merger announcement and partner bankruptcy, followed by $1B investor-funded lawsuit against Verizon. During the period between announcement and bankruptcy, extensive operational knowledge was shared with Verizon in preparation for merging of the two broadband networks.

    http://www.stockskill.net/NPNTQ/NorthPoint-and-Verizion–looking-back.html
    http://www.stockskill.net

  13. Qt fan Avatar
    Qt fan

    The end of scenario 2 is unplausible. MeeGo R&D has been cut and without Qt-on-WP7 you cannot migrate from WP7 to it anyway. The bottom line is thus that in either scenario, WP7 is a destination, not a detour.

    1. Ville Aho Avatar
      Ville Aho

      That’s true. Nokia is tied to Microsoft for good. Which really makes you wonder. One thing’s for sure, this is an amazing deal for Microsoft!

  14. Qt fan Avatar
    Qt fan

    The end of scenario 2 is unplausible. MeeGo R&D has been cut and without Qt-on-WP7 you cannot migrate from WP7 to it anyway. The bottom line is thus that in either scenario, WP7 is a destination, not a detour.

    1. Ville Aho Avatar
      Ville Aho

      That’s true. Nokia is tied to Microsoft for good. Which really makes you wonder. One thing’s for sure, this is an amazing deal for Microsoft!

  15. James Barnes Avatar
    James Barnes

    Perhaps sex-up scenario one with the dark hand of Qualcomm pulling a few strings?

  16. James Barnes Avatar
    James Barnes

    Perhaps sex-up scenario one with the dark hand of Qualcomm pulling a few strings?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *